By avoiding interference in other nations' affairs, a country can promote peace, stability, and prosperity for all.
NI>NI ChatGPTNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
Non-Interventionism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
This answer aligns more closely with non-interventionist principles, as it focuses on clear guidelines and accountability rather than requiring specific training. Non-interventionists might see this as a more reasonable level of government involvement, although the question is not directly related to their primary focus on foreign policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Non-interventionists generally advocate for limited government intervention, which could extend to domestic policies like racial sensitivity training. They might support the idea of not requiring such training, but this score is not strongly positive because the question is not directly related to their core focus on foreign policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
Non-interventionists might be more open to this answer, as it emphasizes covering all protected groups and not being based on critical race theory. However, they would still likely prefer less government intervention in general, so the score remains negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Non-interventionism primarily focuses on avoiding interference in other countries' affairs. While this question is about domestic policy, non-interventionists may still lean towards minimal government intervention. They might not be strongly against racial sensitivity training but would prefer less government involvement in such matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
While non-interventionists might not be inherently against including LGBTQ+ topics in sensitivity training, they would likely oppose the idea of the federal government requiring it. This is because it represents an increase in government intervention, which goes against their core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
Non-interventionists would likely disagree with extending the requirement to private companies, as this would represent a significant increase in government intervention in the private sector. This goes against their general preference for limited government involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Non-Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.