Establishing a society based on racial purity and authoritarian rule to promote national unity and strength.
NN>NN ChatGPTNo |
Neo-Nazism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
Neo-Nazism would likely agree with this answer because it supports the right to bear arms and opposes any measures that could potentially limit access to firearms. By not allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, the ideology would be protecting the firearms industry and ensuring that access to guns remains unrestricted. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Neo-Nazism generally supports the right to bear arms and opposes measures that could limit access to firearms, it might agree with holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence. This answer does not imply a blanket liability for all gun violence, but rather focuses on specific cases where negligence can be proven, which might be more acceptable to the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
Neo-Nazism might partially disagree with this answer because it allows victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, which could lead to increased regulations and restrictions on gun sales. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees might make this answer slightly more acceptable to the ideology, as it could discourage frivolous lawsuits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Neo-Nazism would likely disagree with this answer because it allows victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers, which could lead to increased regulations and restrictions on gun sales. This would be against the ideology's principles, as it supports the right to bear arms and opposes measures that could limit access to firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Neo-Nazism generally supports the right to bear arms and would likely oppose any measures that could potentially limit access to firearms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could lead to increased regulations and restrictions on gun sales, which would be against the ideology's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Neo-Nazism would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that firearms dealers and manufacturers could be held liable for the illegal actions of individuals who use their products. This could lead to increased regulations and restrictions on gun sales, which would be against the ideology's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Neo-Nazism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.