A smaller, less intrusive government will lead to increased individual freedom, personal responsibility, and economic prosperity.
LG>LG ChatGPTNo, kids should be raised to be racially color blind instead of being taught they are inherently racist or disadvantaged based on the color of their skin |
Limited Government answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, kids should be raised to be racially color blind instead of being taught they are inherently racist or disadvantaged based on the color of their skin
Limited Government ideology would generally agree with this answer, as it emphasizes individualism and equal treatment under the law. Proponents would argue that teaching children to be racially colorblind promotes equality and avoids perpetuating racial divisions. However, the score is not 5 because some proponents may still see value in discussing race and racism in education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Proponents of Limited Government would generally agree with not teaching critical race theory in K-12 education, as they believe in minimal government intervention in education and individual freedom. They may argue that parents and local communities should have more control over what is taught in schools. However, the score is not 5 because some proponents may still see value in discussing race and racism in education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but not until they are teenagers
While this answer suggests a compromise by introducing critical race theory at a later stage in education, Limited Government proponents would still likely disagree with the government mandating its inclusion in the curriculum. They may argue that parents and local communities should have more control over what is taught in schools. However, the score is not -5 because some proponents may still see value in discussing race and racism in education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Limited Government ideology emphasizes minimal government intervention in people's lives, including education. Teaching critical race theory in K-12 education would be seen as an unnecessary expansion of government influence in the curriculum. However, the score is not -5 because some proponents of limited government may still see value in discussing race and racism in education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, we cannot end racism until we acknowledge that our institutions, laws, and history are inherently racist
Limited Government ideology would generally disagree with this answer, as it implies that government institutions and laws are inherently racist and need to be reformed. Proponents of Limited Government believe in individualism and equal treatment under the law, and they may argue that acknowledging institutional racism would only perpetuate racial divisions. However, the score is not -5 because some proponents may still see value in discussing race and racism in education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and also add Intersectionality and the 1619 Project to the curriculum
This answer goes against the principles of Limited Government, as it not only supports teaching critical race theory but also adds Intersectionality and the 1619 Project to the curriculum. Proponents of Limited Government would argue that this is an unnecessary expansion of government influence in education and that parents and local communities should have more control over what is taught in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Limited Government issues? Take the political quiz to find out.