Evo vaših odgovora u usporedbi s odgovorima ovog glasača.
Socijalna › Pobačaj
N>N Osobni odgovorPro-life, ali dopustiti u slučajevima silovanja, incesta ili opasnosti za majku ili dijete |
Socijalna › Gay brak
N>N Osobni odgovorUzmi vladu iz braka i umjesto bi ga religiozni odluka |
Domaća politika › Gun kontrola
N>N Osobni odgovorNo, The 4th amendment exist for a reason, to help prevent the government from becoming the very tyrannical entity it is becoming. The whole constitution exist for that same reason. |
Gospodarstvo › Minimalna plaća
N>N Osobni odgovorRaising the federal minimum wage only results in more inflation. everyone gets screwed over by inflation. It is not enough to say no, we must also deregulate where we have regulated way too far, and we should unlock pattens that have been sealed up, pattens that would have dramatically reduced our expenses in a clean way. |
Domaća politika › Politika droga
N>N Osobni odgovorYes, the illegalization of it ends up making it a far worse cash cow problem that goes to organized crime. We will be able to do more research on the health effects of these drugs if they are legal. We get a lot of research done with legalized alcohol, tobacco and other products and know a lot more about the risk with them. |
Domaća politika › Oročeni Granice
N>N Osobni odgovorI'll have to research history for how past congressional members have handled both how long their terms lasted and what they did in those terms, then decide based on a perspective of the over all turn out of histories path to now. |
Imigracija › Imigracija
N>N Osobni odgovorCan't say either way. Other problems such as our job market systems and educational systems, that will be effected by as well as effect the issue of this question, have to be redesigned first before this question can be seriously dealt with. |
Socijalna › Smrtna kazna
N>N Osobni odgovorOstavite to državama |
Zdravstvo › Marihuana
N>N Osobni odgovorYes, so that drug lords and black market crime can be denied enjoying all that money they get from ripping people off. You get more deaths from alcoholism and smoking tobacco anyways. |
Socijalna › Vlada Mandati
N>N Osobni odgovorThe government shouldn't decide for the insurance company. |
Imigracija › Ilegalnog imigranta zadržavanja
N>N Osobni odgovorFirst of all, how do you know that they are illegal immigrants in the first place? If you already know this, then isn't that enough to deport them stand alone? Why would you need a special modification to the law? You can't say yes to doing this to illegal immigrants without opening a door to twisting the law into going around and arresting legal citizens. You should not need to modify more laws to enforce ones you already have. |
Domaća politika › Krojenja teritorija
N>N Osobni odgovorIf by non-partisan commission, you mean a group that cannot benefit from how the lines are drawn, then yes. |
Imigracija › Sigurnosti granica
N>N Osobni odgovorYes! Why don't you have a watch tower of some type posted every 4th a mile? An electronic surveillance tower at every 4th mile... a 2 or 3 manned tower every mile... a 4-6 man post with 2 to 4 land vehicles every 5 miles... A post with a dedicated helipad every 10 miles with the capacity to land 2 copters as well as have a detention center that can humanitarianism cram 100's of people in it for review... the actual helipad port with 2 to 4 copters every 25 miles... each station equipped with long range high powered inferred lights to help assist nigh vision imaging systems... while having the boarders patrolled by crews 1 to 2 humans with 2 to 4 dogs? Topped off for all of that, each human operated station has its own solar and batter power system that provides power to both, its own tower, the 4th mile electronic towers and a backup power to adjacent human operated towers as well as water wells at every 10 mile post supplying water to all the other post to help aid in self-sustaining abilities to reduce over all contentious use cost? And don't waste my time with telling me "it cost to much," when those high cost are the result of out of control excessive regulations that drive up the cost. |
okolina › Alternativni izvori energije
N>N Osobni odgovorNot the wind power industry. Maybe to solar, hydro electrical, geothermal, and other greener systems, even to the degree of finding ways to turn spent nuclear fuel rods into recycled forms of energy. |
Imigracija › Imigracija Zdravstvo
N>N Osobni odgovorSame problems as with children of immigrants applies as well as the need to apply my earlier viewpoint on how to deal with medicare/medicaid. Many things need a serious redesign before this can even be reasonably addressed. |
Imigracija › Radnici imigranti
N>N Osobni odgovorThat can't solidly be answered in an across the board manner. Each case would have to be taken in a case by case bases. |
Domaća politika › Zakon Patriot
N>N Osobni odgovorNo, it allows the government way too much power on top of circumventing the constitution. Steps away from complying with the constitution are steps towards tyrannical rule. With the military might that we have, it should be altogether way to easy to prevent the kinds of attacks that have happened. In fact, those various events them selves are clouded in mystery and marred by confusing lack of clarity. |
Vanjska politika › Izrael
N>N Osobni odgovorYes, build a freaking massive high and 1/4th mild think wall and anti-missile defenses between Israel and its enemies with a 5 or 10 mile wide no intrusion zone that is humanly watched with both human eyes, radar systems, inferred system, thermal imaging systems, night vision system and mulch-spectrum imaging systems. |
Socijalna › Prvi amandman
N>N Osobni odgovorThe U.S. should not be making choices like that. The people should be the only ones to choose if such things should be allowed in or out. There is a separation of church and state after all. Any existing items that are their were the will and choice of the people in the past, not government. If someone things it is unfair that someone else religious beliefs are not being equally represented, then let those people apply to establish their own symbols as well. |
Socijalna › Eutanazija
N>N Osobni odgovorNeka svaka država odluči |
Domaća politika › Afirmativne akcije
N>N Osobni odgovorNo, it re-agitates the subject of racism, sexism and prejudice by showing favor to the select group. The prejudicial doesn't get resolved, it ends up getting flipped like a coin. You still end up with the same problem, just now in the reverse direction. |
Imigracija › U-State Nastava
N>N Osobni odgovorThis question wouldn't be a concern if the already existing laws where properly enforced to begin with. |
Obrazovanje › Zajednička jezgra
N>N Osobni odgovorNo, common core hasn't be very effective and it is far to based on the grade/age system that doesn't address the reality of people being naturally skilled differently. Forcing kids to try and do something the exact same way isn't going to work when they are so clearly specialized differently. Having a set minimum standard to have achieved by the end of the 12th year is ok, as long as the system is focused on helping children find what they are good at and to grown that special personalized skill set while moving towards achieving that minimum standers. |
okolina › Ulje za bušenje
N>N Osobni odgovorWe have plenty of power sources already. The problem is excessive regulation topped with artificial scarcity. |
Vanjska politika › Ujedinjeni narodi
N>N Osobni odgovorDa |
Zdravstvo › Obamacare
N>N Osobni odgovorNO! Forcing people to buy health insurgence for merely existing is total BS! That is way over reaching in power and control. |
okolina › Fracking
N>N Osobni odgovorIn a safer form, not in its current poisonous form. We shouldn't be leaving buried chemicals in the ground that will eventually seep into water supplies. In fact, why are they using the poisonous chemicals that they use now anyways, when they have safer and more efficient extraction methods? |
Vanjska politika › Trutovi
N>N Osobni odgovorThey should fly drones, but they should attempt negotiations. Has anyone asked these terrorist why they want to kill Americans? Is it anger over something that happened in the past? Religious extremism? do they simply feel violated? Has our country actually become at fault of wrong doing to them that we need to reverse and apologies for? |
Vanjska politika › Terorizam
N>N Osobni odgovorDa |
Domaća politika › Edward Snowden
N>N Osobni odgovorDa, istražuju CIA i NSA redatelji umjesto |
Vanjska politika › NSA nadzor
N>N Osobni odgovorIf the NSA wasn't crossing the line so often and massively abusing its power in ways that far to greatly risk tyranny, we wouldn't even need to have this question asked now would we? But the NSA crossed many red lines it never should have and has done so hitting the ground running. the NSA should be disband and all equipment and data it has destroyed. National security should be only about protecting our nations people. Recording all of its civilians data from using any technology is a complete deviation form that with far too much of it potentially able to be used for things that have nothing to do with security from a foreign attack. Way too much power with a much to far reaching potential of abuse. It would be better to build structures out of harder better armored material with buffer zones so see an attack coming verses trying to "secure" our nation via a means that intrudes on our citizens privacy to this extent. Ironically, the method of building up better armored structures and land distance based buffer zones would have easily been do-able in decades past long before over baring, overly strict, overly costly regulations and inflation's as well as taxation's that exist now. |
Gospodarstvo › Poljoprivrednih subvencija
N>N Osobni odgovorNo, there are too many farmers who are completely abusing it to make millions of extra they did not earn. They either sit on their buts and never farm, or they simply re-purpose the field to a different crop that somehow makes its way around a loop hole. The total idea of letting the land replenish it self has failed. |
Gospodarstvo › Mirovinska reforma
N>N Osobni odgovorPensions are going to fail no matter what. You should redesign a different solution in the form of a physically solid self-sustaining asset that produces excess product that it wont need and at that point, wont be able to benefit from using it for its self, resulting in the need to give the excessive resource away. |
Evo kako se možete usporediti s ovim glasačem o popularnim političkim temama.
Lagano se usmjeravate prema "sigurnosti", što znači da more often vjerujete da vlada treba učiniti sve što je u njegovoj moći kako bi osigurala sigurnost svojih građana. Ova tema je najvažnije za vas.
Vi ste centristi na lijevim i desnom krilu. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Vi ste centristi na autoritarnim i libertarijskim pitanjima. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Vi ste centrista za pitanja demokratskog socijalizma i kapitalizma. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Lagano se usmjeravate prema "nacionalizmu", što znači da more often podržavate politike koje određuju interese našeg naroda iznad drugih. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Vi ste centristi na politički netočnim i politički ispravnim pitanjima. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Vi ste centristi o unilateralizmu i pitanjima multilateralizma. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Lagano se usmjeravate prema "vjerskom", što znači da more often podržavate politike koje odražavaju vjerske vrijednosti i principe. Ova tema je više važno za vas.
Vi ste umjereno usmjereni prema "protekcionizmu", što znači da vjerujete da je globalizacija štetna za sigurnost, kompenzaciju, okoliš i životni standard radnika. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Lagano se usmjeravate prema "deregulaciji", što znači da more often vjerujete da vladina regulacija potiskuje inovacije i gospodarski napredak. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Vi ste središte asimilacije i multikulturalnosti. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Vi ste centristi o pacifizmu i militarizmu. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Vi ste centrist na tradicionalnim i progresivnim pitanjima. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Ti si središte izolacionizma i imperijalizma. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Vi ste centristi o individualizmu i kolektivizmu. Ova tema je nešto važno za vas.
Blago si prema "decentralizaciji", što znači da more often vjerujete da se administrativna moć i donošenje odluka trebaju riješiti na lokalnoj razini i služiti najboljim interesima lokalne zajednice. Ova tema je samo manje važno.
Vi ste centristi na natječajima i teškim pitanjima. Ova tema je samo manje važno.
Vi ste centrist u maloj vladi i velikim vladinim pitanjima. Ova tema je samo manje važno.
Vi ste centrist na keynesian i laissez-faire pitanja. Ova tema je samo manje važno.
Vi ste centristi o antropocentrizmu i pitanjima zaštite okoliša. Ova tema je samo manje važno.
Vi ste centristi o pitanjima meritokracije i demokracije. Ova tema je samo manje važno.
Na temelju 6 pitanja koja su rangirani više za vas.
Na temelju 2 pitanja koja su rangirani više za vas.
Na temelju 6 pitanja koja su rangirani nešto za vas.
Na temelju 7 pitanja koja su rangirani nešto za vas.
Na temelju 1 pitanje koje je rangiran nešto za vas.
Na temelju 3 pitanja koja su rangirani nešto za vas.
Na temelju 5 pitanja koja su rangirani nešto za vas.
Na temelju 3 pitanja koja su rangirani nešto za vas.
Evo kakav si u usporedbi s ovim glasačem na tradicionalnoj ideološkoj osovini.
iSideWith.com je najpopularniji vodič za glasanje na svijetu za građane koji mogu pronaći informacije o izborima, političkim strankama, kandidatima, glasačkim jedinicama i popularnim političkim temama u njihovoj zemlji. Neovisni smo i nismo povezani ni s jednim investitorom, dioničarom, političkim strankama ili interesnim skupinama.
Razumijem da slanje moje adrese e-pošte omogućuje iSideWith.com da mi šalje važne obavijesti putem e-pošte. Za više informacija pročitajte našu politiku privatnosti.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Sva prava pridržana. Korištenje ove stranice znači prihvaćanje našeg korisničkog ugovora i pravila o privatnosti . iSideWith.com može zaraditi dio prodaje od proizvoda koji su kupljeni putem naše stranice kao dio našeg pridruženog partnerstva s trgovcima. Materijal na ovoj stranici ne smije se reproducirati, distribuirati, prenositi, pohranjivati ili na drugi način koristiti, osim uz prethodno pismeno dopuštenje iSideWith.com.