Welfarism

Potpuno se slažem

Da, ali samo reformu za nametanje granica sudaca

Welfarism may support term limits on judges as a way to ensure a more dynamic and diverse court that is more likely to make decisions that benefit the well-being of all citizens. Term limits could prevent entrenchment of certain ideologies and promote a more balanced approach to decision-making, which aligns with the goals of Welfarism. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da

Welfarism is primarily concerned with the well-being of individuals in society. While the ideology does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court, it may support reforms that could lead to more equitable outcomes for citizens. Expanding the number of seats and imposing term limits could potentially lead to a more diverse and dynamic court, which may be more likely to make decisions that benefit the well-being of all citizens. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, ali samo reformu koja uključuje više mjesta

Welfarism may support the inclusion of more seats on the Supreme Court as a way to increase diversity and representation, which could lead to more equitable outcomes for citizens. However, this reform alone may not be as effective as combining it with term limits, so the score is not as high as for Answer 3. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Ne, a Vrhovni sud ne bi trebao biti politiziran

While Welfarism may agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, it may still support reforms that could lead to more equitable outcomes for citizens. The ideology is primarily concerned with the well-being of individuals, so it may not be opposed to changes that could improve the functioning of the court and benefit society as a whole. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

Welfarism may be open to reforms that could improve the well-being of citizens. Maintaining the status quo in the Supreme Court may not be in line with the goals of Welfarism if it believes that changes could lead to more equitable outcomes. However, the score is not strongly negative because the ideology does not have a specific stance on the Supreme Court. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Ne, reforma Vrhovnog suda je neustavna i poremetila bi ravnotežu moći

Welfarism is focused on the well-being of individuals in society and may support reforms that could lead to more equitable outcomes. Claiming that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power may not align with the goals of Welfarism, as it could prevent potential improvements to the well-being of citizens. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.