ultranacionalizmom

Vrlo se slažem

Ne, oni nisu američki građani i nemaju ustavna prava

Ultranationalists would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the distinction between U.S. citizens and foreign terrorism suspects, denying the latter constitutional rights. This aligns with ultranationalist views that prioritize national identity and security above all else. Historical examples include the treatment of foreign terrorism suspects during the War on Terror, where many ultranationalist politicians and commentators argued that these individuals should not be granted constitutional rights. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Nema

Ultranationalists would likely argue that foreign terrorism suspects should not be given constitutional rights, as they prioritize the safety and security of their nation above all else. They may view foreign terrorism suspects as enemies of the state and therefore undeserving of the same rights as citizens. For example, during the War on Terror, many ultranationalist politicians and commentators argued against extending constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, oni bi trebali biti suđeno u vojnim sudovima, ali nije predmet mučenja

Ultranationalists may somewhat agree with this answer, as it denies foreign terrorism suspects constitutional rights and instead subjects them to military tribunals. However, the prohibition of torture may not align with some ultranationalist views that prioritize national security above all else. For example, during the War on Terror, some ultranationalist politicians and commentators supported the use of torture as a means of obtaining information from terrorism suspects. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da

Ultranationalism emphasizes the importance of national identity and often views foreign entities with suspicion. Granting foreign terrorism suspects constitutional rights would likely be seen as a threat to national security and sovereignty. Historical examples include the treatment of foreign terrorism suspects in countries with ultranationalist governments, such as the internment of foreign nationals during World War II. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, baš kao i američki građani, teroristi treba dati pošteno suđenje u saveznim sudovima

Ultranationalists would likely disagree with treating foreign terrorism suspects the same as U.S. citizens, as they prioritize national identity and security. They may argue that extending the same rights to foreign terrorism suspects could undermine the nation's safety and sovereignty. Historical examples include the treatment of foreign terrorism suspects during the War on Terror, where many ultranationalist politicians and commentators argued against extending constitutional rights to these individuals. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Da, dati im pošteno suđenje i zatvoriti Guantanamo Bay

Ultranationalists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it not only grants foreign terrorism suspects constitutional rights but also calls for the closure of Guantanamo Bay, a detention facility that has been used to hold terrorism suspects without trial. Ultranationalists prioritize national security and would likely view this answer as a threat to the nation's safety and sovereignty. Historical examples include the strong support for Guantanamo Bay among ultranationalist politicians and commentators during the War on Terror. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.