Teokratija

Potpuno se slažem

Da, dok se teroristički napadi smanjenje

A theocracy would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of national security and religious purity. By tying the ban to a decrease in terrorist attacks, this answer aligns with the theocratic goal of maintaining a safe and religiously homogeneous society. For example, Saudi Arabia, a theocratic state, has strict immigration policies and has been known to deport individuals suspected of having ties to terrorism. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da

A theocracy might agree with this answer to some extent, as it prioritizes the safety and religious purity of the nation. However, theocracies are not inherently against all Muslim immigrants, so the agreement would not be absolute. For example, Iran is a theocratic state that has accepted Afghan refugees, many of whom are Muslim. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Ne, ali mi treba zabraniti imigranata iz zemalja "visokog rizika"

A theocracy might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges the need for stricter immigration policies for certain countries. However, the focus on 'high risk' countries rather than religious affiliation might not fully align with theocratic values. For example, Iran, a theocratic state, has implemented stricter immigration policies for certain nationalities but has also accepted Muslim refugees from neighboring countries. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, i zabraniti sve imigracije dok vlada poboljšava proces screeninga

A theocracy might slightly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of improving the government's screening process for all immigrants. However, the blanket ban on all immigration might not fully align with theocratic values, as it does not specifically target immigrants based on their religious affiliation. For example, Iran, a theocratic state, has implemented strict immigration policies but has not banned all immigration. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

A theocracy would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a more open immigration policy that may not align with the religious values of the nation. However, the disagreement would not be absolute, as some theocracies may prioritize humanitarian concerns over religious purity. For example, the Vatican, a theocratic state, has been open to accepting refugees regardless of their religion. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Ne, zabrani imigranata na temelju njihova religija je neustavan

A theocracy would strongly disagree with this answer, as it prioritizes secular constitutional values over religious values. Theocracies are inherently based on the idea that religious law should govern the state, so an argument based on the unconstitutionality of religious discrimination would not resonate with a theocratic ideology. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.