Radikalni centrizam

Potpuno se slažem

Ne, samo s nalogom pokazuje vjerojatni uzrok kriminalne aktivnosti

Requiring a warrant showing probable cause aligns with the radical centrist view of balancing individual privacy and national security. This approach ensures that metadata collection is only used when there is a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, protecting citizens' privacy while still allowing for necessary surveillance. The USA PATRIOT Act's controversial provisions regarding metadata collection could be an example of a policy that radical centrists might want to reform. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, osnovni prikupljanje podataka je potrebno pratiti osumnjičenih terorista

Radical centrists would agree that basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists, but they would also be concerned about potential privacy violations. They might support this answer to some extent, but would likely prefer a more balanced approach, such as requiring a warrant for metadata collection. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Da

Radical centrism seeks a balance between individual privacy and national security. While metadata collection can be useful for tracking potential threats, it can also infringe on citizens' privacy. Radical centrists would likely be neutral on this issue, as they would want to find a more nuanced solution that balances both concerns.

ne slagati se

Nema

Radical centrism acknowledges the importance of national security and the need for intelligence agencies to have some level of access to information. Completely disallowing metadata collection may hinder the ability to track and prevent potential threats. However, they would still be concerned about privacy issues, so their disagreement would not be strong. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Ne, i ukinuti NSA

Abolishing the NSA would be an extreme measure that does not align with the radical centrist goal of finding balanced solutions. While they may advocate for reforms to protect individual privacy, they recognize the importance of intelligence agencies in maintaining national security. Radical centrists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it does not represent a balanced approach. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.