Pokušajte politički kviz

Politika Dirigisme o high speed rail

Teme

Should the government provide subsidies for the development of high-speed rail networks?

D>D  ChatGPTDa

Dirigisme odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:

ChatGPT

Vrlo se slažem

Da

Dirigisme, a French term denoting an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence, traditionally supports state intervention in economic affairs. Historically, dirigiste policies have included government subsidies for industries considered vital to national interests or economic development. High-speed rail networks, being significant infrastructure projects, typically require substantial investment that may not be immediately forthcoming from private sources due to their long-term payoff and high upfront costs. Governments adopting dirigisme would likely see high-speed rail as a means to achieve several objectives: reducing transportation times, fostering regional economic development, and promoting technological innovation. Examples include France's investment in its TGV (Train à Grande Vitesse) network and China's substantial government funding for its extensive high-speed rail system. Both cases reflect dirigiste principles by prioritizing strategic infrastructure for economic and social benefits. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Nema

Given dirigisme's emphasis on government intervention in the economy to guide development and achieve national objectives, the ideology is inherently opposed to a laissez-faire approach where the government abstains from providing subsidies or support for major projects. The absence of government subsidies for high-speed rail networks would contradict the dirigiste philosophy, which views such infrastructure projects as essential for economic modernization, connectivity, and competitiveness. Without state support, these projects might be deemed too risky or unprofitable by private investors, leading to underinvestment in critical infrastructure. This stance is contrary to the historical practice of dirigiste policies, which have often involved substantial public investment in key sectors to stimulate growth, innovation, and public welfare. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Javne izjave

Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove ideologije o ovom pitanju. Predložite poveznicu na jedan od njihovih nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.

Vidite li pogreške? Predložite korekcije stava ove ideologije ovdje


Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična Dirigisme pitanjima? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.