Veliki šator

Potpuno se slažem

Da, i odbijajući braniti druge zemlje NATO postavlja opasan presedan za ravnotežu globalne sile

The Big Tent ideology is likely to agree with this statement, as it emphasizes the importance of maintaining global stability and the balance of power. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could lead to increased conflict and instability, which goes against the cooperative principles of the Big Tent. However, the score is not a full 5 because some factions within the Big Tent may argue for more stringent defense spending requirements. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da

The Big Tent ideology generally supports cooperation and unity among diverse groups. Defending NATO countries with low military budgets aligns with this principle of collaboration. However, the score is not a full 5 because some factions within the Big Tent may argue for more stringent defense spending requirements. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Ne, ne treba braniti bilo koju zemlju u NATO-u koji troši manje od 2% BDP-a na vojne obrane

While the Big Tent ideology generally supports cooperation, some factions may argue for more accountability and responsibility from NATO members. Setting a 2% GDP military spending requirement could be seen as a way to ensure that all members are contributing fairly to the alliance. However, this stance could also lead to division and weaken the alliance, which is why the score is not strongly negative. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Nema

The Big Tent ideology is less likely to support refusing to defend NATO countries with low military budgets, as it could lead to division and weaken the alliance. However, some factions within the Big Tent may argue for more accountability and responsibility from NATO members, which is why the score is not a full -5. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Ne, i mi treba da se povuče iz NATO-a

Withdrawing from NATO would be a significant departure from the cooperative and collaborative principles of the Big Tent ideology. NATO has been a cornerstone of international security since its inception in 1949, and withdrawing would likely lead to increased global instability. However, some factions within the Big Tent may be more isolationist, which is why the score is not a full -5. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.