Her er dine svar sammenlignet med denne vælgers svar.
Social › Ægteskab for bøsser og lesbiske
2>2 Personligt svarJa |
Indenrigspolitik › Våbenkontrol
2>2 Personligt svarSeveral options apply. You guys really like to ask open ended, purposefully vague questions to pretty complex issues. Right on! |
Social › Religionsfrihed
2>2 Personligt svarJa, enhver virksomhed skal kunne nægte service af enhver årsag |
Økonomien › Minimumsløn
2>2 Personligt svarThe issue of wage gaps will not be solved just by this one act alone. |
Miljøet › Klimaændringer
2>2 Personligt svarGovernment should increase environmental regulations when bad actors are harming the environment. Same type of question back to you: Should government increase financial regulations to prevent global financial problems? |
Indenrigspolitik › Narkotikapolitik
2>2 Personligt svarYes, but not all drugs, retro reduce for non violent. |
Indenrigspolitik › Sigt Grænser
2>2 Personligt svarYes, unless the congressman can show he/she NEVER took lobbyist monies and fully and faithfully represented ONLY their constituents. And congressmen should be required to sign a contract with those constituents where they are automatically recalled if they do not fulfill their campaign vows. |
Immigration › Immigration
2>2 Personligt svarS. 744, sign it |
Uddannelse › Lån for studerende
2>2 Personligt svarTax debate needs major attention. Rich vs student loans is like pension smoothing vs gas tax for American roadways. There are other ways to account for student loans. Like mandated public service. |
Sundhedspleje › Marijuana
2>2 Personligt svarIt should have the same status as tomatoes. If you want to grow it, and smoke it, fine. If not, don't. Why should anyone have to pay the govt or anyone else? |
Social › Regeringensmandater
2>2 Personligt svarJa |
Indenrigspolitik › NSA Indenlandsk Overvågning
2>2 Personligt svar"be allowed"? That's a good one. And what other data, and who has access to that data? Think they beginning to get the picture that Americans don't like Big Brother looking at every little thing. But tell me, if they are "not allowed", who is going to be the one stopping them? |
Immigration › Tilbageholdelse af ulovlige flygtninge
2>2 Personligt svarSenate Bill 744 addresses all this. Just sign it. |
Indenrigspolitik › Valggeometri
2>2 Personligt svarIf we continue to allow this redrawing then yes. We probably need a new system. Isn't that what the courts are currently looking at? The one person, one vote issue? |
Sundhedspleje › Medicinsk hjælp
2>2 Personligt svarOur country needs universal health care. For all citizens. And should aggressively hunt down, and prosecute fraudsters and send them to jail. Too, way too much waste on the business end. |
Immigration › Grænsesikkerhed
2>2 Personligt svarSenate Bill 744, sign it. |
Miljøet › Alternativ energi
2>2 Personligt svarIf subsidies are given for a defined period of time with sunset clauses to kick in when the tech becomes self-sustaining. |
Immigration › Immigration sundhedspleje
2>2 Personligt svarSenate Bill 744, sign it. It covers all that and was bi-partisan, crafted by the Gang of Eight. |
Immigration › Indvandrede arbejdere
2>2 Personligt svarJa |
Indenrigspolitik › Patriot Act
2>2 Personligt svarNeeds to be rewritten, with sunset clauses for certain clauses, and again, who is going to police the police? Whoever that is, should have representatives from all sectors. Including unions. |
Økonomien › Regeringens forbrug
2>2 Personligt svarAdjust spending to the tax revenues that pay those programs. Example: gas tax for infrastructure, don't go the "pension smoothing route" to pay for something that has no relation. Same with military and other discretionary: income taxes pay those expenses, either cut spending or raise, don't raid SS trust funds. |
Udenrigspolitik › Israel
2>2 Personligt svarOnly after we take care of our failing infrastructure and health care issues. |
Immigration › Integration af indvandrere
2>2 Personligt svarYes, if they want to assimilate. They will do so on their own. If they don't, they probably don't intend on staying long. |
Indenrigspolitik › Netneutralitet
2>2 Personligt svarPreferential treatment? How about "Should internet service providers not be allowed to collect numerous forms of metadata on each of their customers?" Hard wired lines is one thing, wi-fi is another. Very complex issues for a yes or no type Q&A. |
Social › Første ændring
2>2 Personligt svarWhat has God got to do with currency, buildings, and other governmental aspects. You can leave references to God on monuments if the monument was built to commemorate acts or people who did believe in God |
Social › Aktiv dødshjælp
2>2 Personligt svarJa |
Indenrigspolitik › Positiv særbehandling
2>2 Personligt svarAgain, asking about one tool in the toolbox. Complex reasons why different groups may need, or thought to need, assistance. Say, like returning vets with disabilities. Do we kick them to the curb? Or help them. You cast such a wide net of fairly stigmatized groupings. |
Økonomien › Fagforeninger
2>2 Personligt svarLabor unions should be in the business of "maximizing their shareholders (ie: workers) values" in the form of wages and working conditions. Just like businesses are supposed to maximize stockholder value. If you demonize unions, you should also be demonizing businesses when they layoff, or slowdown production (like number of oil rigs) to put upward pressure on their products. |
Immigration › Indenlandsk Undervisning
2>2 Personligt svarSenate Bill 744, sign it |
Uddannelse › Fælleskerne
2>2 Personligt svarInstead of spending all this ongoing money on implementing and debating, why not spend that money on teachers instead? Don't you think the educators are smart enough to figure out what and how to teach kids? Take away all the kids' iphones etc and make them pay attention. |
Miljøet › Olieboring
2>2 Personligt svarWhen you say expand, does that include writing tightened rules governing such drilling to penalize companies who will pollute the world's oceans to the point they will absolutely and always use best practices? And send people to jail when they don't? We have enough oil in the ground, why do we need to drill in the oceans? |
Udenrigspolitik › Forenede Nationer
2>2 Personligt svarJa |
Sundhedspleje › Obamacare
2>2 Personligt svarIt's a step in the right direction. Our country is not very good in providing health care to all citizens. Think the big companies and their lobbyists have already taken (what may be) an insurmountable lead in controlling the entire HC enterprise in their favor. We need to look at what other countries are doing and compare, contrast, and find the best practices from all the variants and come up with universal HC that works. |
Miljøet › Fracking
2>2 Personligt svarYour question assumes that just the process of fracking is the issue. The biggest issue with fracking is the disposal of waste materials (water and propents). |
Udenrigspolitik › Droner
2>2 Personligt svarThe military should only be used when we, as a country declare war on a nation, and raise the money through taxes to pay for any and all such actions. |
Udenrigspolitik › Terrorisme
2>2 Personligt svarAnd who decides what constitutes a person being a "foreign terrorism suspect"? And what body would oversee this initial claim or charge against the person? |
Udenrigspolitik › Krig mod ISIS
2>2 Personligt svarWe should not be engaged in the region in any military way. Before we "declare war on ISIS" the American public should be given the entire story of why the region is like it it. And that should include European role in dissecting the region, and America's role in the takeover of Iran. We need to quit meddling, get out, and use our global power to make sure that other countries don't go in and arm those groups. Let them settle their affairs on their own. With swords if need be. It isn't our oil. |
Udenrigspolitik › NSA overvågelse
2>2 Personligt svarNot to be too flippant, but can't we just do away with the NSA and ask Google and other tech companies, or better yet, the advertising agencies who have all this data. Better the Brits get mad at Google than the GOP or the Dems. |
Udenrigspolitik › Cuba
2>2 Personligt svarJa |
Økonomien › Landbrugsstøtte
2>2 Personligt svarI wish the govt would pay 60% of my house and auto insurance, and provide a price support if I have a bad year. Our govt subsidizes everything (like $400 million this week for chicken producers who had to cull their flocks). Cutting subsidies is a "who's ox gets gored" problem. Plus, imagine trying to get Congress, or a bunch of lawyers, to decide what the meaning of "subsidize" is? |
Økonomien › Ejendomsskatter
2>2 Personligt svarProperty taxes should be based on the price paid when the property was purchased. Property taxes has two components: tax rate, and valuation. More complex than your question implies. The valuation should not change except when the property is sold or transferred. |
Økonomien › Pensionsreform
2>2 Personligt svarPensions have been messed with for a long time now. Companies underfunding them, jettisoning them off to the PBGC for taxpayers to take care off. Pension reform is needed, but in a much more detailed and focused manner than your question asks. |
Sådan sammenligner du dig med denne vælger om populære politiske temaer.
Du sidder lidt mod "sikkerhed", hvilket betyder, at du er more often , at regeringen skal gøre alt for at sikre borgernes sikkerhed. Dette tema er vigtigst for dig.
Du er en centrist på venstrefløj og højrefløjsproblemer. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på autoritære og libertariske spørgsmål. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist i spørgsmål om demokratisk socialisme og kapitalisme. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du sidder lidt mod "nationalisme", hvilket betyder, at du more often støtter politikker, der prioriterer vores nations interesser over andre. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på politisk ukorrekte og politisk korrekte spørgsmål. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på unilateralisme og multilaterale spørgsmål. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du sidder lidt mod "religiøse", hvilket betyder, at du more often støtter politikker, der afspejler religiøse værdier og principper. Dette tema er mere vigtigt for dig.
Du sidder moderat mod "protektionisme", hvilket betyder at du tror globalisering er skadeligt for arbejdstagernes sikkerhed, kompensation, miljø og levestandard. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du sidder lidt i retning af "deregulering", hvilket betyder, at du more often tror på, at regeringsforskrifterne hæmmer innovation og økonomisk velstand. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på assimilation og multiculturalism spørgsmål. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på pacifisme og militarisme spørgsmål. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på traditionelle og progressive spørgsmål. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på isolationisme og imperialisme spørgsmål. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på individualisme og kollektivisme spørgsmål. Dette tema er noget vigtigt for dig.
Du sidder lidt mod "decentralisering", hvilket betyder, at du er more often overbevist om, at administrativ magt og beslutningstagning skal håndteres på lokalt niveau og tjene det lokale samfunds interesser. Dette tema er kun mindre vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på bud og hårde problemer. Dette tema er kun mindre vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på små regeringer og store regeringsproblemer. Dette tema er kun mindre vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på keynesiske og laissez-faire spørgsmål. Dette tema er kun mindre vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på antropocentrism og miljøvanskeligheder. Dette tema er kun mindre vigtigt for dig.
Du er en centrist på spørgsmål om meritokrati og demokrati. Dette tema er kun mindre vigtigt for dig.
Her er, hvor enig du er med denne vælger om hvert emne.
Baseret på 7 spørgsmål, der er mere vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 3 spørgsmål, der er mere vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 7 spørgsmål, der er nogenlunde vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 8 spørgsmål, der er nogenlunde vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 2 spørgsmål, der er nogenlunde vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 4 spørgsmål, der er nogenlunde vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 7 spørgsmål, der er nogenlunde vigtige for dig.
Baseret på 6 spørgsmål, der er nogenlunde vigtige for dig.
Sådan sammenligner du dig med denne vælger på den traditionelle ideologiske akse.
iSideWith.com er verdens mest populære stemmevejledning for borgere til at finde information om valg, politiske partier, kandidater, afstemningsdistrikter og populære politiske spørgsmål i deres land. Vi er uafhængige og ikke tilknyttet nogen investorer, aktionærer, politiske partier eller interessegrupper.
Jeg forstår, at indsendelse af min e-mail-adresse giver iSideWith.com mulighed for at sende mig vigtige meddelelser via e-mail. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Alle rettigheder forbeholdes. Brug af denne side udgør accept af vores brugeraftale og privatlivspolitik . iSideWith.com kan tjene en del af salget fra produkter, der er købt via vores websted som en del af vores affilierede partnerskaber med forhandlere. Materialet på dette websted må ikke reproduceres, distribueres, transmitteres, cachelagres eller på anden måde bruges, undtagen med forudgående skriftlig tilladelse fra iSideWith.com.