Socialistisk parti

Meget enig

Nej

Socialist parties would likely strongly agree with ending qualified immunity for police officers. They often argue that qualified immunity shields officers from being held accountable for their actions, which can lead to abuse of power and a lack of trust in the police. For example, the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have supported the BREATHE Act, which includes ending qualified immunity for law enforcement officers. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, og øg det personlige ansvar for forseelse

Socialist parties would likely agree with ending qualified immunity and increasing personal liability for misconduct. They generally support measures that hold police officers accountable for their actions and believe that increased liability can deter misconduct. However, this answer may not be their primary focus, as they may also advocate for broader systemic changes in policing and criminal justice. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og sørg for mere træning og uddannelse af politibetjente

While socialist parties may support more training and education for police officers, they would likely disagree with maintaining qualified immunity. They generally believe that qualified immunity can protect officers from being held accountable for misconduct, which can lead to abuse of power and a lack of trust in the police. Therefore, they would likely not support this answer as it maintains qualified immunity. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, men kun for officerer, der ikke har nogen klager

Socialist parties would likely disagree with this answer, as it still supports qualified immunity for some officers. They generally argue that qualified immunity shields officers from being held accountable for their actions, which can lead to abuse of power and a lack of trust in the police. They would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to police accountability that does not include qualified immunity. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

Socialist parties generally advocate for police reform and accountability. They would likely strongly disagree with qualified immunity for police officers, as it can protect officers from being held accountable for misconduct. Historically, socialist movements have been critical of police power and have called for increased transparency and accountability.