2012 แซนดี้ตะขอยิงโรงเรียนประถมศึกษาที่เกิดจากหลายรัฐและเมืองที่จะผ่านมาตรการการควบคุมอาวุธปืนที่เข้มงวด ในการตอบสนองฝ่ายนิติบัญญัติของรัฐในปืนรัฐในภาคใต้และตะวันตกผ่านค่าใช้จ่ายที่จะสร้างความเข้มแข็งยืนกฎหมายพื้นของคุณและอนุญาตให้มีอาวุธในที่สาธารณะมากที่สุด ในปี 2014, 21 รัฐผ่านกฎหมายที่ขยายสิทธิของเจ้าของปืนช่วยให้พวกเขามีอาวุธปืนในโบสถ์, บาร์, โรงเรียนและมหาวิทยาลัย รัฐบาลไม่ได้ผ่านมาตรการการควบคุมอาวุธปืนใด ๆ ตั้งแต่ปี 1994 เบรดี้บิลและ 42 รัฐในขณะนี้อนุญาตให้ครอบครองปืนไรเฟิลจู่โจม ในสหรัฐอเมริกาสองในสามของการเสียชีวิตทั้งหมดเป็นปืนฆ่าตัวตายและในปี 2010 มีการฆ่าตัวตาย 19,000 11,000 ปืนและคดีอาวุธปืน
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
ลองนึกย้อนกลับไปถึงช่วงเวลาที่คุณหรือคนที่คุณรู้จักได้รับผลกระทบจากความรุนแรงของปืน - มุมมองของคุณเกี่ยวกับการควบคุมอาวุธปืนส่งผลต่อมุมมองของคุณอย่างไร
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณคิดว่าการให้ความรู้และการฝึกอบรมเกี่ยวกับปืนในปัจจุบันเพียงพอหรือไม่ และพวกเขามีบทบาทอย่างไรในเหตุการณ์ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับปืน
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
การเปลี่ยนแปลงกฎหมายอาวุธปืนอาจส่งผลกระทบต่อชุมชนแตกต่างกันอย่างไรโดยขึ้นอยู่กับลักษณะทางเศรษฐกิจและสังคมหรือทางภูมิศาสตร์
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณคิดอย่างไรเกี่ยวกับความสำคัญทางวัฒนธรรมของปืนในสังคมอเมริกันและผลกระทบต่อกฎหมายปืน
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณจะเสนอให้สร้างสมดุลระหว่างสิทธิในการแก้ไขรัฐธรรมนูญฉบับที่สองโดยมีเป้าหมายเพื่อลดการเสียชีวิตจากปืน โดยเฉพาะการฆ่าตัวตายอย่างไร
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณมีความคิดเห็นอย่างไรเกี่ยวกับการใช้อาวุธปืนเพื่อการป้องกันตัวเองเทียบกับความเสี่ยงที่อาจเกิดขึ้นต่อชุมชน
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณคิดว่าความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างสุขภาพจิตและการเข้าถึงอาวุธปืนควรได้รับการแก้ไขอย่างไรในกฎหมายเกี่ยวกับปืน
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณสามารถแบ่งปันเรื่องราวหรืออารมณ์ที่รวบรวมมุมมองของคุณว่ากฎหมายปืนที่เข้มงวดยิ่งขึ้นจะทำให้คุณรู้สึกปลอดภัยมากขึ้นหรือน้อยลงหรือไม่
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
คุณคิดว่าการมีอาวุธปืนเปลี่ยนแปลงพลวัตภายในสถานที่ทั่วไป เช่น โรงเรียน โบสถ์ หรือบาร์ ในทางใดบ้าง
@ISIDEWITH5 มอส5MO
ประสบการณ์ส่วนตัวเกี่ยวกับความปลอดภัยหรือการขาดประสบการณ์อาจส่งผลต่อจุดยืนของการเป็นเจ้าของปืนของใครบางคนได้อย่างไร
@2HWS9GZ4ปี4Y
No, we need to have more "gun control" restrictions on the manufacturers of guns.
@2HWR3764ปี4Y
Gun control is simple: keep them out of the hands of convicted felons and the mentally ill. Banning guns from public use entirely puts them in the hands of the government, which is a dangerous and frightening situation. The mentally ill should not be allowed to possess a gun, no matter how much progress they have made through therapy and/or medication, due to the potential of relapse. Convicted felons should not allowed guns for obvious reasons, as they could potentially commit more crimes. "Stand Your Ground" laws, in principle, are good, but can be used for the wrong purpose.
@2HWPC264ปี4Y
Felons with a violent history should not be able to own guns, however, guns should be allowed in stores, schools, etc. for safety purposes
@2HWMD3G4ปี4Y
No, the right to bare arms is the second amendment
@2HWKZK34ปี4Y
what gives someone the right to control what another holds? who has a right to say do not touch that plant, rock, metal, chemical, on their own land. but in public areas this is reasonable. transportation between places should be as free as possible so long as no crimes using the guns are committed.
@2HW7TN94ปี4Y
No, only for mental health patients who are considered dangerous and not your typical mother who happens to take Paxil! Convicted felons fall under a laws that were created a century ago when $500.00 was considered a lot of money. They have constitutional rights just like anyone else and should not be tried again daily once they have paid their debt to society!
@2HVYGB94ปี4Y
No guns! If other countries can do it so can we.
@2HVXPTB4ปี4Y
No, but strictly enforce the laws already on the books
@2HV54R34ปี4Y
More control but also harsher penalties for gun-related crimes as well as accidents that result because of negligence
@clj8456pol4ปี4Y
2nd amendment should be repealed and states given the power to legislate gun ownership regulations according to their respective cultures.
@2HTVWGG4ปี4Y
I'd like to shoot the person in the leg who included this question. I think the government should actually intervene on this one. Normally I don't want the government to assist but this time? Yes.
The government should GIVE every american a hand gun and a rifle upon their 21st birthday as long as the person is willing to take gun safety classes and demonstrates no past history of mental illness.
Free guns for all americans.
@2HT9HPW4ปี4Y
Yes, because as the 2nd amendment states, guns are for a well regulated militia ready to take up arms against a threat to the country. Most people do not meet this qualifications, and we already have this in the form of police and the army.
@2HT2VY54ปี4Y
No. Assault weapons is a meaningless phrase used to describe scary looking guns. There are plenty of regulations against automatic weapons.
@2HT2STP4ปี4Y
No. Criminals ignore them. Kill the controls on the books and get back to Constitutional government.
@2HSZL7N4ปี4Y
The Right To Keep and Bear Arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!
@2HSGC6Q4ปี4Y
Gun control might be a good idea but doing it by working around the 2nd amendment only weakens all liberties. If GC is good, first revoke 2nd amendment.
@2HSFWGG4ปี4Y
I dont mind it as long as they are using it for defensive purposes.
@2HSC4B74ปี4Y
Abolish military grade weaponry outside of active U.S. combat personnel (including assault weapons). Don't ban guns period from public use (doing so I think is unconstitutional); local militias not on federal watch lists should be unhindered by federal and state law enforcement. Annual psychological testing and check-up training must be mandatory.
@2HS4SSN4ปี4Y
Absolutely, the 1st Amendment is not specific and was never intended to include today's weapons; machine guns et al. The amendment must be interpreted to today's issues, just as others have been.
@2HRN7GQ4ปี4Y
Require manufacturer to track weapons from cradle to grave. Increase penalties for gun related crimes. Increase personal accountability for gun possession.
@2HRLNY94ปี4Y
I think that there should be a constitutional amendment that gives Congress more flexibility when it comes to gun control legislation. The weapons during the time of the Founders and the weapons of today are very different. I suspect they would have chosen their wording differently had they envisioned the weaponry we have today.
Also, I think gun control laws should primarily be handled at the state or local level. Owning a powerful rifle may make sense on a ranch in a Western state, but probably not a good idea to be tagging one along in the middle of a heavily populated urban area.
@2HRJ9GP4ปี4Y
Yes, but in the form of higher taxes and regulations for corporations in the gun and ammunition industry.
@2HQ2S8F4ปี4Y
No one should be able to own weapons.
@2HP84QK4ปี4Y
people were killing each other with rocks and sticks long before there were guns
@2HN36VB4ปี4Y
enforce laws on the books already, add them to all sale of guns, ban assault weapons and ban parading around looking like Rambo
@2HN34RL4ปี4Y
No, but make the existing laws, count. Health issues should be enough to prevent any one from getting a permit to carry arms.
@2HMX9TSรีพับลิกัน4ปี4Y
Yes, but banning individuals with "mental health issues" specifically from owning guns increases the stigma around these illnesses; we need to limit the sale and use of firearms for everyone and stop conflating mental issues with gun violence.
@2HKDHTP4ปี4Y
No, there is zero evidence that increasing regulations on sales and ownership of firearms reduces the crime rates. Get tougher on violations of existing law.
@2HHWDXY4ปี4Y
Yes, but the problem needs to be attacked from multiple angles, including reducing poverty and increasing social programs to reduce and prevent gang violence
@2HH8HKY4ปี4Y
I feel gun control is largely a measure by which to protect mostly white upper-middle class citizens from what they feel to be lower-class, minority-driven disorder. I do not underestimate the danger of gun violence at schools and other public places (such as theaters). But I feel these incidents reflect less a problem with guns and more a problem with mental health and the poor quality of mental healthcare in this country. Gun violence is incidental to that. Spending on healthcare should be the priority, not necessarily greater gun restrictions. I do support strict surveillance and controls… อ่านเพิ่มเติม
@2H9G9S94ปี4Y
Most people with guns will let their 3 year olds shoot them in Kentucky and that is not safe at all.
Plus people don't really need to hunt these days to survive. Animals are going endangered because of a sport. If someone needs to hunt in order to live they need to get someone to check their location and if they are isolated from any markets etc then they can hunt and use a gun. Other wise no.
We have a tremendous gun control problem in this country but more than that we have a huge mental health problem in this country. The availability of guns to children and the mentally unstable is ludicrous. Though I would prefer an existence in which guns do not exist, PERIOD. I feel certain that if they were banned entirely only criminals would have guns. Take into consideration The attack on Charlie in Paris in January 2015, Mohammad Mehra in Toulousse and the attack on the Jewish school and Anders Breviak and the death of 79 people, mostly children, in Norway.
No, and eliminate all laws, federal, state and municipal restricting the ownership and carrying of weapons. Any convictions resulting from non-violent and non-negligent gun association should be vacated, and any public official advocating for gun control should be censured, and eligible for impeachment for infringing on the constitutional rights of their constituents.
There is absolutely no legitimate or honest interest in government regulation or restriction of the right for citizens to defend themselves, their families, and their property by any means that they wish.
I don't support increased gun control, but developing a more intensive screening process to hopefully limit those who really shouldn't have their hands on a weapon could be helpful. Yes, it'd make things more tedious, but law abiding citizens who want to keep their rights will go through with the thorough screening and training. Even if guns become outlawed, there will still be those who do not follow the law and what are their would be victims supposed to do? The police and designated individuals who have permits can't be everywhere at once and innocent blood will be shed either way.
@2GQV8TV4ปี4Y
It is our God-given right to own a firearm. The federal government cannot and will not take my right to own a gun.
@2GMSCWY4ปี4Y
How many more Sandy Hooks do we need before we ban all guns. No one needs to hunt--grocery stores have enough for everyone. People should be forced to cities form the rural areas where the animals should be allowed to live unmolested. Federal game officers can manage dangerous animals that wander into the city.
@2GMS4LF4ปี4Y
No, and repeal the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, the Gun Control Act of 1968 and any other acts; the country did just fine following the Constitution prior to those Acts and they have caused more problems than they have solved.
@2GKLQJB4ปี4Y
End poverty and american paranoia, racism and homophobia, guns would not be such a big deal.
@N9X7T34ปี4Y
Cars kill more people AND can kill more people maliciously than guns. We make you get a license to get a car. Put some educational requirements and educate EVERY american on guns to take the "video game" nature out of the deadly tool. Be a parent, don't make the government do your job, lazy ***
@N9TGCH4ปี4Y
No, ball and powder muskets should be unregulated, but all other firearms should require well-regulated militia membership like the 2nd Amendment states.
กิจกรรมในอดีตของผู้ใช้ที่มีส่วนร่วมกับ question นี้
กำลังโหลดข้อมูล...
กำลังโหลดแผนภูมิ...
กำลังโหลดหัวข้อทางการเมืองของผู้ใช้ที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการสนทนานี้
กำลังโหลดข้อมูล...