Try the political quiz

277 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What does 'fairness' mean to you when it comes to dividing wealth among people?

 @9H7QF62Libertarian from Michigan answered…5mos5MO

Equal wealth, without much context, seems like a nice thing. In practice, it doesn't seem very ethical. People should be paid according to how hard they work, but people with moderately easy jobs should still be able to make a living.

 @9H7QSSWRepublican from Idaho answered…5mos5MO

Fairness means those who work hard should earn a higher pay. Those who do not work hard earn a lower pay

 @9H7QKF2 from Georgia answered…5mos5MO

Fairness means those who work hard should earn a higher pay. Those who do not work hard earn a lower pay

 @9H7XKRF from Iowa answered…5mos5MO

Everyone and I mean everyone is well within the money-earning range of each other not everyone is paid exactly equal as that would be unfair to those who risk their lives but, everyone is treated equally and expected of equally.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

In what ways do you think equality in wealth would change the kinds of dreams and goals people pursue?

 @9J5VFJ7 from Florida answered…4mos4MO

everyone would have a fair chance to achieve their dreams

 @9J6875D from Rhode Island agreed…4mos4MO

Is it my job to? I'm just a regular Joe Shmoe with a specialty that is not political bull **** . We pay taxes and elect people who are supposed to do the research and make these rational choices on our behalf. Why dont YOU give me the deets? I am worrying about supporting my child and surviving thanks to **** y *** govt and the **** y *** people who run it. I dont have the LUXURY of having time to research something other than ways to make money that dont violate my moral code.

 @9J5VHJT from Ohio answered…4mos4MO

Equality being prioritized can lead to more job oppertunity leading to more governement funding

 @9J5VKPS from Pennsylvania answered…4mos4MO

I don't believe everyone should be equal because then no one will want to be better or do great things

 @9J5VC85 from South Dakota answered…4mos4MO

I feel like it would change the social parties and how people view others.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Could the removal of wage disparities lead to a stronger sense of community, and in what ways?

 @9J5TH87 from Texas answered…4mos4MO

If there wasn't any wage disparities of course the community would be strengthened. The ways it would be strengthened would be less crime probably but it will also lead to people going back to like a barter system for trade.

 @9J5TF73from Maine answered…4mos4MO

No, it will always end with a certain group having more while doing the same or maybe even less.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel if earning more was not an option, no matter how hard you worked?

 @9H7RBHZ from Michigan answered…5mos5MO

I think that would be a very bad idea because everybody should get the amount of stuff that they work for.

 @9H7SNY6Peace and Freedom from Florida answered…5mos5MO

I would be mad if earning more was not an option no matter how hard you worked cause I feel that a person should be able to get rasies if they are working harder and showing intrest in their jobs more than others they should be rewarded for hard work.

 @9H7T54R from Illinois answered…5mos5MO

I think that there should be a cap on the amount of money a person can make, however, there should still be room for promotion and pay raises so that people will still have the motivation to work hard.

 @9H7TJYBanswered…5mos5MO

I would be mad because if I'm doing extra work and working hard I should be able to earn more

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Imagine a world without billionaires; how do you think this would affect innovation and technological advancement?

 @9J5WDLRSocialist from California answered…4mos4MO

Billionaires should not exist. Under capitalism, this should be enforced by a maximum wage, and very high minimum wages. But capitalism should be replaced completely with Socialism.

 @9J647GT from New York disagreed…4mos4MO

if everyone is making the same money there is no incentive to find that next new thing or offer the best in service. you would have a batch of lazy people just waiting on their check to get a new box of fudge rounds.

 @9J5VD87 from Massachusetts answered…4mos4MO

Communism hasn’t really worked before. A world without billionaires would be a world with a lower wealth-ceiling, but it may also lower the amount of determination throughout the overall economy. The economy is inherently a competition, the American economy, so taking the competition away and giving everyone a medal would be a massive adjustment for the majority of Americans. Communism is a nice idea on paper, but the real-world and human factors of our nation make it not so appealing or realistic.

 @9J5VB8PWomen’s Equality from Pennsylvania answered…4mos4MO

I think it would affect innovation and technological advancements in so many different ways.

 @9J5VTWP from California answered…4mos4MO

If there were no billionaires in the world then I feel we wouldn't be as advance as we are, because very smart individuals who have money made some of the inventions we use today.

 @9J99DDHDemocrat from New York agreed…3mos3MO

I think people who have money have access to materials and opportunities that make it easier for them to advance technology, even easier than for a very smart person with no money.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you stay motivated in your education or job if your efforts didn't lead to personal financial gain but benefited society as a whole?

 @9H8MFXWanswered…5mos5MO

i would not be very motivated to work if it didn't lead to personal benifit

 @9H9JHCM from New Jersey answered…5mos5MO

I would pursue my dream career, and I wouldn't have to worry about how much it pays.

 @9H9JDDZ from California answered…5mos5MO

I would not agree in some point because I am just helping the society but I am not doing if for myself neither receving something that helps me.

 @9H8MD2Yanswered…5mos5MO

I simply wouldn't as that's not the way I operate. I work only for my beneficial gain and for those I hold dear to me

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Can a society truly progress without competition, and what would progress look like to you in such a society?

 @9H898N3 from Washington answered…5mos5MO

Society needs competition to thrive, because without it there would be no incentive to make forward progress. Communism takes away that aspect of competing for wealth, property, things of personal significance.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…4mos4MO

One’s personal wants are the main focus instead. When your needs are met, you can worry about your wants, your life, and the prosperity of those you care for, instead of trying to make ends meet. If we shared our ideas, knowledge, and resources, we’d supercharge innovation as long as any positive incentive exists. The profit would simply be less.

 @9H887YN from New York answered…5mos5MO

I believe that capitalism should be allowed to an extent because people should all be appointed the same opprotunities for education and to get a job, but no one should get more opprotunities than others. And taxes should still allow for a living wage wherever one is and whatever job one has. Progress is when a society is better at being successful personally while aiding those who are less fortunate.

 @9H88C78 from Utah answered…5mos5MO

 @9H88JYWLibertarian from Nebraska answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you find more satisfaction in work if you knew it directly helped others instead of increasing personal wealth, and why?

 @9H8MND4answered…5mos5MO

 @9H8MJ5Banswered…5mos5MO

I wouldn't be more satisfied working if I knew it wouldn't increase my wealth because it is my work and not other people's work.

 @9H8MJ35Green from Indiana answered…5mos5MO

Absolutely, because knowing how your work helps others is essential for wellbeing

 @9H8MH8Fanswered…5mos5MO

If it directly helped others. If all my needs were met and I was in no way struggling for myself I would rather help others in need.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If you weren't working to earn money, how much more or less time would you devote to helping others?

 @9HGMH6V from Washington answered…5mos5MO

 @9HGMDP6answered…5mos5MO

I would devote a lot of time helping others. However I despise communism in all its forms.

 @9HGMBSC from Washington answered…5mos5MO

I would of course want to help others, but working would seem less effective if you are not being rewarded for the work you put in. You should be paid for the work that you do.

 @9JVHZSDCommunist from Minnesota commented…3mos3MO

you are because in the overview it says" each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs."

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…4mos4MO

Probably more if I had the opportunity. If one’s survival isn’t on the line, I’d probably be more supportive of the “hustle” mentality.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...