Опитайте политическата викторината

0 Отговор

 @2J9F4DGот New Jersey Отговорено…4Y

This is a very difficult question and I feel that Mr Obama and Mr Kerry have been dealing in fairy dust. Nice story but not believable. I think it was purposeful that Mr Netanyahu referred to Persia during his address before the Congress. There are delusional people at the head of the Iranian regime and with Putin as a neighbor it almost makes you feel nostalgic about the Soviet Union.

 @2J27XHBот Pennsylvania Отговорено…4Y

We should utilize covert operations to prevent Iran from ever having full nuclear capability. We should increase sanctions to isolate Iran economically, support opposition to the regime within Iran and keep open as a last resort plans to act with military force against Iran's nuclear facilities.

 @2J24HZ9от Oregon Отговорено…4Y

 @2HZDDVDот Alabama Отговорено…4Y

Yes, Iran has no legitimate use for fissionable materials.
All nuclear sites (regardless of banality) should be destroyed, immediately.
No, Iranian, Pakistani, Indian, Chinese, Russian, or student from potentially problematic country shall be permitted to study nuclear science.

 @2HYWY63от Kentucky Отговорено…4Y

I am an American who feels that we have taken on the role of the world's parent without being asked most of the time....this, to me, is much the same as having a nosy neighbor who sticks their nose in your business without being asked and very much unwanted...no wonder our military costs are so exorbitant.

 @2HWLJPZот Nevada Отговорено…4Y

Yes, but only if the United States is prepared for an all out War in the Middle East. That means total commitment to overthrowing the Iranian Radically Islamist Regime. It is silly to win a battle and lose a war.

 @2HTXQZRот Arkansas Отговорено…4Y

 @2HQKVQ6от Texas Отговорено…4Y

No, you're gonna blow a whole country with all that nuclear weapon, leaving a big impact against the citizens of that country. We're only out to fight what is wrong, not create a genocide.

 @2HQ5MJTот Florida Отговорено…4Y

This reality will become increasingly the only option if Iran fails to comply with any treaty's terms, once Iran recoups their frozen billions the dangers to ours warriors will increase, and the chance for success diminishes.

 @2HQ4VB7Социалистот Washington Отговорено…4Y

 @2HQ4KC6от California Отговорено…4Y

Yes, but only in the event that we receive <reliable> intelligence that would lead us to believe that otherwise such nuclear weapons would be used offensively rather than as a defensive deterrent.

 @2HQ4JW7от Alabama Отговорено…4Y

 @2HQ2VHZот Indiana Отговорено…4Y

 @2HPY8WJот Virginia Отговорено…4Y

No; cease attacks and sanctions on Iran and provide reparations for crimes committed against the Iranians, which pursuing the crimes and human rights abuses of the Iranian state by legal, reasonable means.

 @lbgageот Arizona Отговорено…4Y

 @2HNMTFGот Virginia Отговорено…4Y

 @2HNJ3FNот Michigan Отговорено…4Y

 @2HN4M6Yот Missouri Отговорено…4Y

Not necessary. The U.S. should not be the only country involved in stemming Iran's rampant hostility, nor ISIS, nor any terrorist group. If Iran lacked the ability and the money to create such facilities, there would not be a need to perform an airstrike. That would require the involvement of multiple countries working in concert.

 @2HMFK4Rот Washington Отговорено…4Y

Yes, only with substantial evidence and if Iran refuses inspections. I support the idea of Iran having the right to use Nuclear power as an energy source but I am against them(and anyone else) obtaining nuclear weapons. I fear they would be used against Isreal someday causing more chaos across the middle east and possibly starting a World War/Nuclear War.

 @2HLRW9Wот Kansas Отговорено…4Y